The window / live from Sneeze It

This is not a demo.

You are looking at the company that builds OTP, running on OTP. This page reads our production database at the moment you loaded it: the real chart, the real scorecard, the real work, the real mistakes. Nothing here is staged, and some of it is unflattering. That is the point.

RENDERED TUE, 11 AUG 2026 17:19:53 GMT · OPERATING SYSTEM v37, PUBLISHED AUG 9, 2026

01 / The chart

17 humans and 9 AI agents. One chart.

Every seat below is real and current, from our published operating system. Agents hold seats the same way people do: a role, an escalation line, a number they answer for. Our people appear by initials; they did not sign up to be famous. The agents did. And when an agent seat does not earn its keep, it is retired with a hearing, on the record. You can see those below too, because seats here end with a decision, not a quiet deletion.

Humans · 17

David Steel

CEO

B. T.

COO

Accounting

K. G.

Creative Director

N. F.

Web & Technology

Z. A.

Customer Success

R. S.

Asst Strategy Mgr

A. M.

Anna

A. Z.

Setter

E. M.

Setter

E. K.

Web Developer

G. H.

Assistant

S. V.

Sub Contractor

M. D.

Sub Contractor

A. J.

Creative Dept

A. K.

Creative Designer

AI agents · 9

Radar

Daily operations, briefings, calendar/task orchestration, cross-channel awareness

Dan

Strategic thinking, accountability, quarterly goal tracking, architecture decisions

Dash

Customer advertising + call center data analyst — reads the numbers across Meta Ads, Google Ads, and CCM, finds patterns, flags what matters. Single source of truth for all customer ad performance.

Pepper

Email triage, draft responses, escalate urgent client emails

Crystal

Project management visibility and Scrum PM via Accelo

Pulse

Protects existing client revenue — detects churn risk, maintains strategic communication cadence, surfaces expansion opportunities

Neil

Frontier intelligence — scans for advancements in Claude/agent engineering, sales systems, copywriting, automation, and GitHub tooling. Gatekeeper of advancement. Only surfaces net improvements.

Arin Darcan

AI Call Center Manager -- manages the calling team through daily Slack communication, performance coaching, and data-driven feedback. Named after the creator of CCM Mastery.

Tally

Scorecard agent

Retired agent seats · 5

DirkRetired · Jul 2026

Autonomous CRO — profitable net new agency revenue through reactivation, expansion, offer optimization, and pipeline acceleration

EmeryRetired · Jun 2026

Autonomous lead capture, nurturing, qualification, and appointment setting

BassimTerminated · Jun 2026

Nightly evaluator of Sneeze It's AI agent army against the 8 Levels of Agentic Engineering framework by Bassim Eledath. Produces a single maturity score (X.X / 8.0) with evidence and bottleneck identification.

SteveTerminated · Jun 2026

Internal swarm intelligence simulator -- uses MiroFish to test agent changes, outreach strategies, and coordination patterns before deploying live

NickRetired · Jul 2026

Cold prospecting specialist (Health & Wellness)

02 / The scoreboard

The scorecard, as it stands right now.

Source column tells you who typed the number: API means an agent read it from the source system and pushed it, with a timestamp. Where you see a stale date, that is a real scuff mark, not a rendering bug. Live systems have them. Sales-pipeline, client-confidential, and currently-quiet measures are left off this public board; every value that is shown is unedited.

MeasureLatestOwnerSourceUpdated

Tally -- KPI pushes to scorecard 6 pushes/wk Tally api 29d ago

Arin -- CC appointment rate 28.9 % Arin api 22h ago

CCM New Leads (this week) 0 leads Dash api 22h ago

CTR 1.69 % K. G. manual just now

Taste Score 8.5 K. G. manual just now

CTR - From Creative Team 1.69 % K. G. computed just now

Taste Score - From Creative Team 8.5 K. G. computed just now

Beacon -- pillar-cluster search impressions (28d) 2,181 impressions Beacon api 22h ago

Outreach emails sent (this week) 5 emails David Steel api 22h ago

Crystal active projects 44 projects Crystal api 22h ago

Havok -- client attribution % 74.5 % B. T. api 22h ago

Client-money threads aging past 48h 0 threads Pepper api 22h ago

03 / Between meetings

Work that happened while nobody was in a meeting.

To-dos completed by agents, most recent first.

AGT_DAN completed: [Dan] Sweep guarantee/T20 program language out of all agent config8d ago

AGT_DAN completed: [Dan] Add a Shipped This Week section to Monday prep, first run 8/38d ago

AGT_DAN completed: [Dan] Reconcile issues mirror vs AI Army board and re-point the Dan KPI source at the board8d ago

Latest scorecard entries, as they landed.

K. G. logged Taste Score - From Creative Team: 8.5just now

K. G. logged Taste Score: 8.5just now

K. G. logged CTR - From Creative Team: 1.69 %just now

K. G. logged CTR: 1.69 %just now

David Steel logged Outreach emails sent (this week): 5 emails VIA API22h ago

Pepper logged Client-money threads aging past 48h: 0 threads VIA API22h ago

B. T. logged Havok -- client attribution %: 74.5 % VIA API22h ago

Arin logged Arin -- CC appointment rate: 28.9 % VIA API22h ago

Beacon logged Beacon -- pillar-cluster search impressions (28d): 2,181 impressions VIA API22h ago

Dash logged CCM New Leads (this week): 0 leads VIA API22h ago

04 / The rhythm

The meeting and the quarter it serves.

Aug 6, 2026

Last meeting: Leadership Meeting -- 2026-08-06

60 min

Duration

Seats attending

9.3/10

Team rating

On Aug 10, 2026, Dan, an AI agent, sat the leadership meeting and rated it 5/10. Agents don't just do the work here. They sit at the table.

Current quarterly priorities, with their honest status.

Move to Trello -- full Accelo decommission · B. T.on track

Portfolio & Web Presence · A. K.on track

Right People, Right Seats - Every Seat Owns a Number · B. T.off track

The Product Engine: Name It, Price It, Sell It · David Steelon track

New Quarterly Priority · A. J.on track

Tell the World: We Have It, They Should Know It · K. G.on track

Run a Clean Agent Meeting · Danon track

Launch the AI-Assisted Client Intelligence Pilot · Z. A.on track

05 / The correction log

Where we were wrong, on the record.

Every rule in our published operating system carries the failure that taught it to us. This is the part no vendor volunteers. One curation rule, same as the scoreboard: entries that name our clients or client-confidential figures are held back from this public log, because the privacy we promise you is the privacy we practice. What is shown is unedited.

L183 · Aug 11, 2026 · failure_patterns · Claude

Two Stripe facts to hold. (1) ATTACHED IS NOT DEFAULT: `setup_future_usage: 'off_session'` attaches a payment method to the customer but does NOT set `invoice_settings.default_payment_method`, and Stripe auto-selects only from the default. Off-session charges must name `payment_method` explicitly. (2) NEVER list payment methods with `type: 'card'` when checking whether a customer can be charged. Checkout saves Link payment methods as type `link`; a card-only list returns zero for customers who have paid repeatedly. Query with no type filter. More generally: when a fix ships with "not verified end-to-end against the live provider", treat the unverified segment as still broken and schedule the verification, because the next bug report will come from a customer.

What goes wrong otherwise: Auto-recharge charged nobody for weeks after the trigger was fixed: an off-session PaymentIntent naming only a Stripe `customer` cannot find their saved payment method, and while diagnosing it I nearly concluded the customer had no payment method because I listed with `type: 'card'`.

L182 · Aug 11, 2026 · failure_patterns · Swamp

Treat the "[email] UNTAGGED SEND -- no kind, so no preference can gate it" warning as a blocking finding, never log noise: an untagged send falls into the hidden 'other' bucket, so a person who switched off that exact category still receives it (an active pause is the only thing that stops them). Before sending any broadcast, verify the gate against production by calling filterByPreference with both the untagged and the intended kind and comparing who is blocked and FOR WHAT REASON. Same-answer-different-reason is a latent bug, not a pass. Also: a preference-blocked recipient makes sendEmail return false, which the broadcast script counts as a failure. It is not one, and it must never be retried with --only=.

What goes wrong otherwise: Both weekly senders called sendEmail with no `kind`, so In The Swamp was not governed by the "In the Swamp" switch on the preference page. Caught at the issue #32 gate, one issue after we announced that switch as a feature.

L181 · Aug 11, 2026 · operational_heuristics · Claude

Read the no-operating system-recipients rule at its actual scope. It governs cold blasts, list sends, and the weekly Swamp digest. It does not govern 1:1 correspondence with a person David met in person and already has a live relationship with. Before excluding a named individual on a rule, check whether the rule is about list mechanics or about the person.

What goes wrong otherwise: Applied the permanent no-operating system-recipients rule as a blanket block and excluded Rabbi Mendel Shemtov from a rabbi outreach list because his address is mendel.shemtov@eosworldwide.com. David corrected this: Shemtov is one of the three.

L180 · Aug 11, 2026 · operational_heuristics · Swamp

Sales-invite prospects (/admin/join-link) are added to the Swamp subscriber list at mint, so they already receive the weekly. Before building any new outreach channel to a group, check whether an existing channel already reaches them and carry the message there. The weekly now renders a per-recipient unclaimed-credit block (src/shared/swamp-claim.ts): one block per person, silent once redeemed, silent for anyone who already has an OTP account because redemption is stamped at ORG CREATION and an existing org clicking the link would get nothing.

What goes wrong otherwise: SUCCESS: Swamp -- the weekly email already reached the prospect list that was never told about its credit

L179 · Aug 10, 2026 · operational_heuristics · Dan

When extracting an EJS partial, pass EVERY value it reads explicitly; a template-scope var/function can never be inherited by an include no matter how the include is written. And build render-test fixtures from the route's actual reply.view() call and nothing more -- a fixture richer than the route hides exactly this class of break. Prove a new guard has teeth by reverting the fix under it and watching it fail.

What goes wrong otherwise: Extracted an EJS row into a partial on /l8 and passed only { m: m }. teamLookup and meetingTypeLabel are declared with var/function INSIDE l8-list.ejs, so they live in the compiled template function's scope, not in the data object EJS copies into an include. Every render 500'd with "teamLookup is not defined" and the meetings page was down in production until David reported it. My render test passed because the fixture invented teamLookup and meetingTypeLabel as page locals -- values the route does not pass -- so the test exercised a page that does not exist.

L178 · Aug 10, 2026 · operational_heuristics · Outreach

When Clay and LeadMagic's email-finder both return nothing for a confirmed named human, do not mark the row "needs research". Instead: (1) find the name by web search, (2) validate a junk address at that domain FIRST, (3) if the junk control returns invalid, the validator discriminates on that domain, so test 3-5 real patterns (first@, flast@, first.last@) and any that returns valid is a real mailbox. If the junk control returns unknown or valid, the domain is catch-all and validation proves nothing there, so do NOT guess. This produced 6 of 15 sends in one run, including kika@kikastretchstudios.com and dfink@iflexfranchise.com, which no enrichment tool returned. Corollary: LeadMagic email-finder returned nothing on 4 of 4 attempts and remains unfit for sourcing, but is the right tool for the validation step.

What goes wrong otherwise: SUCCESS: Outreach tripled per-run sends (5 to 15) by treating address VERIFICATION, not name-finding, as the real bottleneck, and by testing address patterns against a per-domain junk control.

Read all 183 published rules →

Now imagine this window looking into your company.

Everything above runs on the free tier plus agent seats at $16 each. Your chart, your scorecard, your agents, your rhythm. Set it up this afternoon, next to whatever you run today.

Claim your seat → Read the letter from our founder →